Resisting the urge to “otherize”

A woman supporting Donald Trump poses for a portrait on May 7, 2016, at a rally at the Northwest Washington Fair and Event Center in Lynden. (Photo by Jovelle Tamayo.)

In the past month since President Donald Trump took the oath of office, my social media has been filled with emotion.

“I really don’t care anymore how I know you — whether we are related, whether we went to high school together, or whether we once called each other friends — if you are celebrating anything that has happened during the last week, I really have nothing to say to you other than that I am horrified and disgusted.”

“If you’re ignoring (or worse supporting) this madman, you are failing your country and shame on you.”

“If this offended you in anyway do me a favor and unfriend my American ass!!!”

These are just a tiny sample of the barrage of social media posts that express the raw feelings many in our country and communities have been experiencing.

Even though the sorting based on ideology has accelerated since the election, it has been happening for a long time. Liberals want to live in liberal cities, and conservatives in conservative communities. We seek news outlets that confirm our biases, and we can’t agree on a shared set of facts. We are quick to judge and attack those who disagree with us, and we find ourselves formulating a response before the person we’re talking to finishes their thought. But most alarming of all is that empathy and understanding of others is occupying less space in our lives.

I’m certainly guilty of that.

Last quarter, I taught a class called “Israel and Palestine Through Film” in Mercer island through the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at the University of Washington.

After the first session, a student in this class self-identified as a supporter of the current president. Our short conversation started with her telling me about a lecture she attended about Japanese Americans and Executive Order 9066. She felt that the speaker didn’t give an accurate or complete story because she didn’t mention the fear that Americans were going through during World War II, which ignored what she felt to be the valid concerns of the populace.

In our short conversation she also mentioned to me that the last 8 years felt like a constant attack on her values.

“We’re Americans too, you know,” she said.

I gathered that “we” meant conservatives. It could have meant white, I suppose. But our conversation didn’t last long enough for me to ask for a clarification. I had to rush to another class. I asked her to come to the next class early so that we can finish the conversation, but that didn’t happen.

So, I judged. I complained to my friends and family and made myself feel better about our exchange by saying to myself that I am on the right side of history. And I congratulated myself, believing not to further engage is the right choice because I shouldn’t validate such nonsense and hate.

I know very few things about this woman other than her name. I don’t know if she has a family, a job, friends. I don’t know what books she likes to read, what films appeal to her or what music she likes.

Yet I did the one thing I always caution against — “otherizing,” or to harsher extent, dehumanizing someone by dismissing her views.

We all wear different identities. Immigrant, son of refugees, Arab, liberal, father, husband are just a few of mine. And even though these identities shape who I am as a person, I don’t want to be solely defined by them alone. We are complex beings, and if I believe there is more to me than the identities I wear, why am I not extending that belief to others?

I’m sure a lot of us would like to constantly conduct ourselves in a manner that that reflects our goodness instead of our cruelty. If I had the luxury of having this conversation again, I would try to listen without judgment. Listening is the first step toward understanding and empathy.

We are deeply divided and rightfully struggling with many questions about our state, country, and world. What does it mean to be an American? Who are we as a nation, and what do we stand for? When do we engage in these tough conversations, and when do we walk away? And most importantly, how do we draw the line between love and hate?

I am not naïve. I know that our deep divisions cannot be healed through simply listening to different stories and contemplating different narratives. It also won’t just take finding one or two things we might have in common. Or even sitting down and having a meal with someone whose views you may despise. But whether we like it or not, we are all part of the same state and same country. Learning how to coexist is no longer a luxury, but a necessity. Life with fear, anxiety, and distrust is not sustainable, nor is it in accordance with our ideal of the pursuit of happiness.

I want to be more connected and less afraid. I want to make sense of the world. I want to be grounded in the idea that no matter the external circumstances, we as a people can forge a path forward with mutual respect, honesty, and understanding.

That no matter the noise, politics, or even ideology, we can take lessons from our common history, and move forward with a renewed desire for exploration of our American identity.   


  1. What a refreshing take. We can always find something to disagree on, but I assure you, the reverse is true. I think it’s so important to find common ground in order to get a better understanding of others and issues. You may still find reason to dislike them or not respect them, but at least it will be based on more than otherizing (love that term, Zaki). I’ve always believed that to be informed and passionate about something, you must hear the other side. Going in blind is not an option. Thank you for the article, Zaki. Thank you for living what you say and admitting when you don’t, and learning from it.

  2. Few people I’ve met are as capable of bridging the divides between different people as Zaki Hamid. He’s a master at establishing a safe space for conversation – and sparking meaningful dialogue. The work he’s done around the state to bring people together is essential – and more important than ever. I’m proud to call him my colleague and, more importantly, my friend.

  3. 60+ million people who voted for Trump are not racist, homophobic and Islamophobic or half of the Trump supporters are not deplorables and irredembiles. Hate starts from top.. Trump got elected by beating am inept, dishonest candidate. They made the mistake by downgrading Bernie and discouraging Biden. Bear with this all. Country was divided 8 years ago and still is divided more so. Thanks to Checks and Balance system, not much will change in next 4 years. Remain optimist.

  4. If all things where equal, that would be great. These days as well as in the past has shown us (the human species) that this not the world we actually live in. More and more I’m starting to see debates like this that amount to nothing more than a false equivalence. In encounters like this be aware that once some one gets their preface by you, they got you. So question everything and scrutinize intent to the fullest before you surrender your position.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.